Facsimile Transmission of Health Information (Updated)Editor's note: The following information supplants information contained in the June 2001 practice brief "Facsimile Transmission of Health Information (Updated)."BackgroundThe quality of healthcare is enhanced when patient health information is readily available to healthcare providers. Even in an increasing electronic environment, use of facsimile (fax) machines and fax software remains commonplace. Fax machines scan a document and convert the text to electronic impulses that are then transmitted over telephone lines. The receiving fax converts the electronic impulses back to text.Providers may choose to fax health information about a patient, for example, when intercampus or regular mail delivery proves too slow. Similarly, hospital transcription and ancillary departments may use fax software to deliver a copy of a dictated report or laboratory result to the physician's office as soon as the report is transcribed or otherwise made available. Although fax equipment and software can enhance the quality of healthcare by facilitating rapid transmission of health information, this same mode of transmission opens up the possibility that information will be misdirected or intercepted by individuals to whom access is not intended or authorized. In recent years, numerous reports have described events wherein patient health records were inadvertently faxed to a wrong location (e.g., bank or retail store) rather than the intended recipient. Legal and Regulatory RequirementsMost federal regulatory requirements such as HIPAA, the Medicare Conditions of Participation, and the Confidentiality of Substance Abuse Patient Records do not specifically address the use of fax equipment or copies. However, the Department of Health and Human Services addresses fax use in a limited manner through the following HIPAA guidance:The HIPAA Privacy Rule permits providers to disclose protected health information to another health care provider for treatment purposes. This can be done by fax or by other means. For example:State laws vary and may address the use of fax equipment in licensing or health information laws or regulations, or possibly those related to specific types of diseases, such as sexually transmitted disease or mental health problems. Many states have adopted rules based on the Federal Rules of Evidence or Rule 803 of the Uniform Rules of Evidence (URE). The URE recognizes that business records created and relied on in the ordinary course of business possess a circumstantial probability of trustworthiness and are admissible as evidence. According to the URE, "a duplicate is admissible to the same extent as an original unless (1) a genuine question is raised as to the authenticity or continuing effectiveness of the original, or (2) in the circumstances it would be unfair to admit the duplicate in lieu of the original." A number of states have adopted the Uniform Photographic Copies of Business and Public Records Act, which authorizes the admissibility of reproductions made in the regular course of business without need to account for the original. Some states have adopted the Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act, which also addresses the admissibility of record reproductions. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, formerly the Bureau of Policy Development of the Health Care Financing Administration, addressed the subject of transmitting physicians' orders to healthcare facilities via fax machine. In Letter no. 90-25, dated June 1990, the Bureau states: The use of fax to transmit physicians' orders is permissible. When fax is used, it is not necessary for the prescribing practitioner to countersign the order at a later date. Note, however, that fax copies may fade and may need to be photocopied. Healthcare facilities should be advised to take extra precaution when thermal paper is used to ensure that a legible copy of the physician's order is retained as long as the medical record is retained. Legislation at the federal and state levels may also affect faxing practices. An amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, addressing discovery of electronic records, will be implemented December 1, 2006. It involves the access, use, and preservation of information, data, and records created or maintained in electronic media. How this new e-discovery rule affects faxed documents is not clear at this time. Recommendations
Prepared by:Alicia Blevins, RHIA, CHPNancy Davis, MS, RHIA Beth Hjort, RHIA, CHPS Chrisann Lemery, MS, RHIA Wendy Mangin, MS, RHIA Debra Mikels Cindy Nicholas, RHIA, CHP This practice brief was originally prepared in 1996 by Mary D. Brandt, MBA, RHIA, CHE, and was previously updated in 2001 by Gwen Hughes, RHIA. AcknowledgmentsAHIMA’s Privacy and Security Practice CouncilLydia Washington, MS, RHIA, CPHIMS Jill Callahan Dennis, JD, RHIA Cheryl Smith, BS, RHIT, CPHQ Note1. Department of Health and Human Services. "Health Information Privacy and Civil Rights Questions & Answers." Privacy of Health Information/HIPAA, Answer IDs 482, 356, and 475. Available online at http://healthprivacy.answers.hhs.gov/cgi-bin/hipaa.cfg/php/enduser/std_alp.php.ReferencesAHIMA. "Facsimile Transmission of Health Information Position Statement." May 1994.Hughes, Gwen. "Notice of Privacy Practices." AHIMA practice brief. 2002. Available online in the FORE Library: HIM Body of Knowledge at www.ahima.org. Letter No. 90-25. Bureau of Policy Development, Health Care Financing Administration, June 1990. In Tomes, Jonathan P., Healthcare Records Management, Disclosure and Retention: The Complete Legal Guide. Chicago, IL: Probus Publishing Company, 1993.
|